翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ KOHL
・ Kohl
・ Kohl (cosmetics)
・ Kohl (surname)
・ Kohl Briefmarken-Handbuch
・ Kohl Center
・ Kohl Children's Museum
・ Kohl International Teaching Awards
・ Kohl Jik
・ Kohl McCormick Academy of Outstanding Educators
・ Kohl McCormick Early Childhood Teaching Awards
・ Kohl Mythos
・ Kohl Plateau
・ Kohl Stewart
・ Kohl Sudduth
Kohl v. United States
・ Kohl's
・ Kohl's Plaza
・ Kohlan
・ Kohlbach
・ Kohlbach (Ammer)
・ Kohlbach (Gersprenz)
・ Kohlberg
・ Kohlberg & Company
・ Kohlberg (Fichtel Mountains)
・ Kohlberg (surname)
・ Kohlberg Kravis Roberts
・ Kohlberg, Baden-Württemberg
・ Kohlberg, Bavaria
・ Kohlberg, Styria


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Kohl v. United States : ウィキペディア英語版
Kohl v. United States

''Kohl v. United States'', 91 U.S. 367 (1875), was a court case that took place in the Supreme Court of the United States. It invoked the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and is related to the issue of Eminent Domain.
==Facts of the case==
Eminent domain was used to seize private property, with just compensation, for the construction of a post office, a customs building, and other government buildings in Cincinnati, Ohio.
==The Court’s ruling==
The court ruled that it is necessary for the government to be able to seize property for its uses, such as creating infrastructure, which ultimately are determined by the legislature and not the judiciary. This essentially gives the government ultimate ownership over all property, because it is not viable for the government to hold out against the obstinance of private individuals to appropriate land for government uses. This power of eminent domain is not only a privilege of the federal, but also state governments. While the petitioners protest that no act of the United States Congress was used to determine the details of the acquisition, the Court ruled such legislation appropriate but unnecessary; it did not prevent the right to acquire land from being vested in the United States Secretary of the Treasury. Another argument addressed is that the government can determine the value of the property, to “justly compensate” the individual property owners; the court ruled that the assessor of the property is determined by law, and as stands the property can be assessed by the government. There was also discussion, regarding the Court’s jurisdiction in this case to be accurate.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Kohl v. United States」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.